chore: Update auto triage guidelines #3882
Conversation
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📋 Review Summary
This PR updates the issue triage workflow to use a new label format and adds more specific guidelines for handling issue priorities. The changes are clear and improve the automation. I've left one minor comment regarding a typo.
🔍 General Feedback
- The changes are well-documented within the workflow file itself.
- The new guidelines for handling high-priority issues and preserving existing labels are good additions.
|
There is a problem with the Gemini CLI PR review. Please check the action logs for details. |
product-auto-label
bot
added
size: s
|
@gemini-cli /review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📋 Review Summary
This pull request updates the guidelines for the Gemini CLI's automated issue triage workflows. The changes aim to standardize the labeling process and clarify the handling of high-priority issues.
🔍 General Feedback
The overall direction of the changes is good, particularly the move to a more structured labeling system (type: and priority:). However, there is a significant contradiction in the new instructions that needs to be addressed. The guidelines instruct the AI to add a comment for high-priority issues, while also stating that it should not add any comments. This conflict needs to be resolved for the workflows to function as intended.
|
|
No description provided.