Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify that PaintGlyph never recurses into COLR data #216

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 15, 2021
Merged

Clarify that PaintGlyph never recurses into COLR data #216

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 4 additions & 1 deletion OFF_AMD2_WD.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1459,7 +1459,10 @@ For information about applying a fill to a shape, see 5.7.11.1.3.

The glyphID value shall be less than the numGlyphs value in the 'maxp'
table (5.2.6). That is, it shall be a valid glyph with outline data in the
'glyf' (5.3.4), 'CFF ' (5.4.2) or CFF2 (5.4.3) table.
'glyf' (5.3.4), 'CFF ' (5.4.2) or CFF2 (5.4.3) table. Only that
outline data is used. In particular, if this glyph ID has a description in the
COLR table (glyphID appears in a COLR BaseGlyph record or the BaseGlyphV1List),
that COLR data is not relevant for purposes of the PaintGlyph table.

**5.7.11.2.5.6 Format 6: PaintColrGlyph**

Expand Down