docs: support clarification for filesystem (#14560)

(cherry picked from commit 8d196c0)

docs/sources/operations/storage/filesystem.md

@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
 ---
 title: Filesystem object store
-menuTitle:  Filesystem object store
+menuTitle: Filesystem object store
 description: Describes the features and limitations of using a filesystem object store with Loki.
-weight:  300
+weight: 300
 ---
 # Filesystem object store
 
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ A folder is created for every tenant all the chunks for one tenant are stored in
 
 If Loki is run in single-tenant mode, all the chunks are put in a folder named `fake` which is the synthesized tenant name used for single tenant mode.
 
-See [multi-tenancy]({{< relref "../multi-tenancy" >}}) for more information.
+See [multi-tenancy](https://grafana.com/docs/loki/<LOKI_VERSION>/operations/multi-tenancy/) for more information.
 
 ## Pros
 
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ Great for low volume applications, proof of concepts, and just playing around wi
 
 ## Cons
 
+The filesystem is not supported by Grafana Labs for production environments (for those customers who have purchased a support contract).
+
 ### Scaling
 
 At some point there is a limit to how many chunks can be stored in a single directory, for example see [issue #1502](https://github.com/grafana/loki/issues/1502) which explains how a Loki user ran into a strange error with about **5.5 million chunk files** in their file store (and also a workaround for the problem).
@@ -44,4 +46,4 @@ The durability of the objects is at the mercy of the filesystem itself where oth
 
 ### High Availability
 
-Running Loki clustered is not possible with the filesystem store unless the filesystem is shared in some fashion (NFS for example).  However using shared filesystems is likely going to be a bad experience with Loki just as it is for almost every other application.
+Running Loki clustered is not possible with the filesystem store unless the filesystem is shared in some fashion (NFS for example). However using shared filesystems is likely going to be a bad experience with Loki just as it is for almost every other application.