-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
remove promql support #1454
Comments
Hello, We are using the prometheus ingest/query functionality with metrictank. Even if it has some limitations, it works fine for our usage (btw, we have started to look at alternatives to suits our scale). Thank you, Note: ping @beorn- |
Our main issue is that we can't jusitify spending time on that ourselves right now as almost no-one is using the prometheus integration of metrictank (or paying for support for it). @woodsaj thoughts? |
prometheus on top of metrictank has never really worked great, due to minor design differences between graphite and prometheus.
and our prometheus integration uses an old version of the library that results in vendoring conflicts when we want to use prometheus elsewhere (e.g. the instrumentation of the jaeger library), which is annoying
Since Cortex or Thanos are better solutions for prometheus users, we will remove the prometheus ingest/query functionality out of the metrictank platform.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: