-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
Add standalone Docker image for mt-gateway #1627
Conversation
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ then | |||
docker tag grafana/metrictank grafana/metrictank:$tag | |||
docker tag grafana/metrictank grafana/metrictank:$version | |||
|
|||
docker build -t grafana/mt-gateway --target=mt-gateway -f ${DIR}/Dockerfile . | |||
docker tag grafana/mt-gateway grafana/mt-gateway:$tag | |||
docker tag grafana/mt-gateway grafana/mt-gateway:$version |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is mt-gateway
descriptive enough for the docker image name?
grafana/metrictank-gateway
maybe?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i think mt-gateway is fine. people will only come looking for this when they already looked into metrictank, and were linked to this.
our target users are not people who randomly browse around the internet, find this and say "hey i want to use this but i don't know what mt means"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do I need to have someone create the initial repository, or does that just automatically happen on push?
Would be nice to not have the build break on merge
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should work. we'll see
b51cfa1
to
6954128
Compare
560a595
to
c3dc215
Compare
Adds a new
mt-gateway
target to the existing Dockerfile.Currently only publishes to dockerhub (no gcr)