Alerting integration use get for receiver key #2894
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mderynck
added
the
pr:no public docs
matiasb
approved these changes
Aug 29, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does
Fixes an issue where OnCall could not parse Alerting configuration if there was a route created without a receiver. The case where this comes up is a notification policy matcher is defined for the purpose of ignoring certain label values before continuing on to other matching rules.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes
Checklist
pr:no public docsPR label added if not required)CHANGELOG.mdupdated (orpr:no changelogPR label added if not required)