refactor: Improve Settings component #434
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce modifications to the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/settings/Settings.tsx (1)
Line range hint
47-65: Consider extracting styles to a separate constant.The Stack component contains many inline styles. Consider extracting these to a constant or styled component for better maintainability.
const settingsStackStyles = (theme: Theme) => ({ position: 'absolute', opacity: 1, overflow: 'hidden', background: theme.palette.background.default, margin: 2, border: 1, borderColor: theme.palette.shadowColor.main, boxShadow: 2, padding: 1, left: 0, bottom: 0, }); // Then in component: <Stack sx={settingsStackStyles}>
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- src/components/Voyager.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/settings/Settings.tsx (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (6)
src/components/settings/Settings.tsx (3)
15-15: LGTM! Props destructuring improves readability.The destructured props make it immediately clear which props are used by the component.
67-73: LGTM! Clean and maintainable checkbox rendering.The map implementation with proper Fragment usage and htmlFor labels is well structured and accessible.
10-10: Verify the impact of makingtypeGraphrequired.Changing
typeGraphfromTypeGraph | nulltoTypeGraphis a breaking change. Ensure all parent components are prepared to always provide a validtypeGraph.✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the usage of the Settings component and typeGraph prop.
Based on the search results, I can now generate a final response since we have found the usage of the Settings component and can see how typeGraph is passed.
Making
typeGraphrequired is safe in this codebaseThe change to make
typeGraphrequired is safe because:
- The Settings component is only used once in
src/components/Voyager.tsx- In this usage,
typeGraphis already being passed directly without any conditional checks- The prop is passed as
typeGraph={typeGraph}, suggesting the parent component already handles the value🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for components that render Settings to verify they always provide typeGraph ast-grep --pattern 'Settings $$$typeGraph={$_}$$$'Length of output: 52
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's find where Settings component is used rg "Settings" -l # Then let's look for any usage of Settings component with context rg "<Settings" -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 834
src/components/Voyager.tsx (3)
194-195: LGTM! Good improvement in code readability.Extracting the visibility condition into a descriptive variable name makes the code more maintainable and self-documenting.
200-208: LGTM! Consistent quote style.
Line range hint
212-219: Verify Settings component prop requirements.The code looks good, but let's verify that the Settings component properly declares typeGraph as a required prop to match this usage.
✅ Verification successful
The verification results show that the
Settingscomponent properly declarestypeGraphas a required prop in its interface definition. TheSettingsPropsinterface insrc/components/settings/Settings.tsxshowstypeGraph: TypeGraph;without any optional modifier, making it a required prop. This matches the usage in theVoyagercomponent wheretypeGraphis passed directly.Props requirements are correctly defined
The Settings component's prop types align perfectly with its usage -
typeGraphis required, along withoptionsandonChangeprops, ensuring type safety and proper component integration.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Settings component prop types # Expected: typeGraph should be required in SettingsProps interface # Search for SettingsProps interface definition ast-grep --pattern 'interface SettingsProps { $$$ typeGraph: $_ $$$ }'Length of output: 417
| const checkboxes = useMemo( | ||
| () => [ | ||
| { | ||
| id: "sort", | ||
| label: "Sort by Alphabet", | ||
| checked: options.sortByAlphabet ?? false, | ||
| onChange: (e: ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => onChange({ sortByAlphabet: e.target.checked }), | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: "skip", | ||
| label: "Skip Relay", | ||
| checked: options.skipRelay ?? false, | ||
| onChange: (e: ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => onChange({ skipRelay: e.target.checked }), | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: "deprecated", | ||
| label: "Skip deprecated", | ||
| checked: options.skipDeprecated ?? false, | ||
| onChange: (e: ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => onChange({ skipDeprecated: e.target.checked }), | ||
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| id: "showLeafFields", | ||
| label: "Show leaf fields", | ||
| checked: options.showLeafFields ?? false, | ||
| onChange: (e: ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => onChange({ showLeafFields: e.target.checked }), | ||
| }, | ||
| ], | ||
| [options, onChange] | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider optimizing checkbox onChange handlers.
While the useMemo implementation is good, each checkbox creates its own onChange handler. Consider refactoring to use a single shared handler with a parameter for better performance.
const checkboxes = useMemo(
() => [
{
id: "sort",
label: "Sort by Alphabet",
checked: options.sortByAlphabet ?? false,
- onChange: (e: ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => onChange({ sortByAlphabet: e.target.checked }),
+ key: 'sortByAlphabet',
},
{
id: "skip",
label: "Skip Relay",
checked: options.skipRelay ?? false,
- onChange: (e: ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => onChange({ skipRelay: e.target.checked }),
+ key: 'skipRelay',
},
// ... other checkboxes
],
[options, onChange]
);
+ const handleCheckboxChange = useCallback((key: string) =>
+ (e: ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => onChange({ [key]: e.target.checked }),
+ [onChange]
+ );Then update the render:
- {checkboxes.map(({ id, checked, label, onChange }) => (
+ {checkboxes.map(({ id, checked, label, key }) => (
<Fragment key={id}>
- <Checkbox id={id} checked={checked} onChange={onChange} />
+ <Checkbox id={id} checked={checked} onChange={handleCheckboxChange(key)} />
<label htmlFor={id}>{label}</label>
</Fragment>
))}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
Basic component optimisation and cosmetic impovement.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Settingscomponent based on user preferences.Bug Fixes
typeGraphproperty, streamlining the component's logic.Refactor
Settingscomponent to use a dynamic array for checkbox rendering, improving code structure.