-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 827
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
natural=beach should be rendered also at lower zoom levels #420
Comments
I plan on making a pull request for this one (and other very similar situation) and I wonder why landcover is frequently blocked from appearing below some zoom level. Is it done for performance reasons? |
Partly for performance reasons (low zoom levels become very slow) but also for aesthetic reasons. When the map zooms out far enough, lots of tiny 3-pixel-wide blocks of different colours doesn't look great. But that's just in general - nothing against the plan suggested here. |
We could add more minimum area sizes to prevent too many pixel-size areas showing up. |
There is a really huge military area in the South of England which could / should render at a low zoom. |
Is it a beach? If so, could you link this location? If no - can you create a new ticket (and link location of this feature)? |
It seems that even narrow beaches render well - as it is a long object on shores there is no danger of small unidentifiable pixels in weird colours appearing in various places. |
natural=beach should be rendered also at lower zoom levels (10, 11), at least at 12 (currently it appears at 13)
see for an example http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=42.9847&mlon=27.8891#map=12/42.9847/27.8891
I hope that something like this would not be significant performance hit.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: