Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add label for amenity=car_sharing #800

Closed
matthijsmelissen opened this issue Aug 1, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

Add label for amenity=car_sharing #800

matthijsmelissen opened this issue Aug 1, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@matthijsmelissen
Copy link
Collaborator

amenity=car_sharing is currently rendered with icon, but without label. In bigger places there are multiple operators, so rendering the name or operator value would be nice.

See also https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3526.

@matthijsmelissen matthijsmelissen added this to the New features milestone Aug 18, 2014
@matthijsmelissen matthijsmelissen changed the title Label for carsharing Add label for amenity=car_sharing Sep 24, 2014
@matkoniecz
Copy link
Contributor

I want to encourage interested people to reach some consensus what should be displayed - name/operator/brand. I know less that it is necessary to decide on some variant - and I want to implement some kind of label as part of refactoring and fixing amenity-points.

@HolgerJeromin
Copy link
Contributor

In the cities i checked, brand is not often used but operator.
In Aachen, Stuttgart, Heilbronn, Karlsruhe and Cologne you would be interested in the "name (operator)" (or operator if name is missing) for selecting the location for your rental.

@nebulon42
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a consensus yet? I'd like to fix #857, but I don't know how the label should be displayed.

@sb12
Copy link
Contributor

sb12 commented Aug 16, 2015

This has been solved by #1452.

@matthijsmelissen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks for pointing out.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants