Improve packet_forgery_v6 #791
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Function is still a mess but at least no memory leaks and static analyzer warnings anymore.
jjnicola
approved these changes
Jul 8, 2021
ArnoStiefvater
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2021
Improve packet_forgery_v6 (backport #791)
ArnoStiefvater
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2021
Improve packet_forgery_v6 (backport #791)
|
Issue SC-286 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What:
Improve packet_forgery_v6()
Function is still a mess and might still contain errors but at least no memory
leaks and static analyzer warnings anymore.
Why:
How:
Checklist: