[master] Add find_all to eregmatch() nasl function. Backport #875
#876
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The current implementation only returns the first match in the string. Now it will return all matches if the option `find_all: TRUE` is passed to the function. For backward compatibility, if FALSE is passed or no option, it will return the first match as before.
jjnicola
force-pushed
the
regex-master
branch
from
c214860 to
fd8d730
Compare
jjnicola
changed the title
find_all to eregmatch() nasl functionfind_all to eregmatch() nasl function. Backport #875
y0urself
approved these changes
Sep 15, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport #875
What:
Add
find_allto eregmatch() nasl functionWhy:
The current implementation only returns the first match in the string.
Now it will return all matches if the option
find_all: TRUEis passed to the function.For backward compatibility, if FALSE is passed or no option, it will return the first match as before.
How:
See PR #875
Checklist: