Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add IdP timeout, remaining backward compatible #1072

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from
Closed

Add IdP timeout, remaining backward compatible #1072

wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

atropos112
Copy link
Contributor

Hello there,

I have attempted to use Authelia with OpenID storing pbkdf2 hash in values.yaml for authelia's helm chart and then storing the secret for grist. To do this comparison Authelia can take few seconds often surpassing the 3500ms timeout window that is the default value as described here. I didn't see an env variable I could adjust this timeout with so this is the PR of me attempting to add it.

Please do note, I don't know typescript/javascript at all, the code i wrote "looks ok" to me but please do double check.

Copy link
Collaborator

@fflorent fflorent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sounds good to me!

@atropos112
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry for responding so late, I am on holidays as the moment. I have added a comment, I do need re-approval please.

Copy link
Collaborator

@fflorent fflorent left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cool, thanks!

This PR also needs approval of someone of Gristlabs

@atropos112 atropos112 closed this by deleting the head repository Aug 3, 2024
@fflorent
Copy link
Collaborator

fflorent commented Aug 3, 2024

Hello @atropos112! I see that you have closed the issue. Could you share with us the reason?

@atropos112
Copy link
Contributor Author

I was cleaning my forked repos, didnt see any response here so assumed its stale. The change is no longer vital to my use case either.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants