WIP - Use anonymous blade component for history #16769
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
Ugh, I'll try rebasing again. :( |
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
snipe
force-pushed
the
history-table-component
branch
from
05ec114 to
b7ba48c
Compare
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
Signed-off-by: snipe <snipe@snipe.net>
This was referenced Jun 3, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This sets the stage to address #14182, and also sets us up to be more consistent with the history tables across all first-class objects, which will make it much easier to make sure we're using the same strings, same columns in the same order, etc.
I still have a bit more work to do on this, namely actually solving #14182, but this gets us a lot of the way there unilaterally.
Additionally, this starts capturing changes across more types of first-class objects. All of the observer work in this PR will be obviated once @uberbrady is done with #16707, where we eliminate the observers altogether, but it at least starts populating that data.