Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix: allow two detectors exactly in offline search #4464

Merged

Conversation

GarethCabournDavies
Copy link
Contributor

The offline search was erroring when it was trying to run exclude_zerolag without any other statmap files.

This adds some logic to allow that search configuration

@GarethCabournDavies
Copy link
Contributor Author

@maxtrevor could you merge once the search test completes? Automerge doesnt take that into accoutn and it will take a while so it will be a bit late for me

@maxtrevor
Copy link
Contributor

@maxtrevor could you merge once the search test completes? Automerge doesnt take that into accoutn and it will take a while so it will be a bit late for me

Sure

@maxtrevor maxtrevor merged commit 7aaf869 into gwastro:master Aug 23, 2023
GarethCabournDavies added a commit to GarethCabournDavies/pycbc that referenced this pull request Oct 11, 2023
* bugfix for skipping exclude_zerolag in two-detector-exactly search

* Allow the search to use two-detectors exactly

* clarify why a job is removed in the exact-coincidence case
PRAVEEN-mnl pushed a commit to PRAVEEN-mnl/pycbc that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2023
* bugfix for skipping exclude_zerolag in two-detector-exactly search

* Allow the search to use two-detectors exactly

* clarify why a job is removed in the exact-coincidence case
bhooshan-gadre pushed a commit to bhooshan-gadre/pycbc that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2024
* bugfix for skipping exclude_zerolag in two-detector-exactly search

* Allow the search to use two-detectors exactly

* clarify why a job is removed in the exact-coincidence case
acorreia61201 pushed a commit to acorreia61201/pycbc that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2024
* bugfix for skipping exclude_zerolag in two-detector-exactly search

* Allow the search to use two-detectors exactly

* clarify why a job is removed in the exact-coincidence case
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants