New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

I already had lodash in here, with with node:assert now available, I didn't really need Hoek anymore #34

Open

mattboutet wants to merge 2 commits into main from no-hoek

Member

mattboutet commented Feb 27, 2023

No description provided.


          I already had lodash in here, with with node:assert now available, I …

d901eb1

…didn't really need Hoek anymore

coveralls commented Feb 27, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 104

19 of 20 (95.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
Overall coverage remained the same at 99.887%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
lib/index.js	13	14	92.86%

Totals
Change from base Build 99:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	884
Relevant Lines:	885

💛 - Coveralls

coveralls commented Feb 27, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 106

19 of 20 (95.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
Overall coverage remained the same at 99.887%

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
lib/index.js	13	14	92.86%

Totals
Change from base Build 99:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	884
Relevant Lines:	885

💛 - Coveralls


          Update author field in package

bc0b375

Member Author

mattboutet commented Feb 28, 2023

Leaving open until other pal projects are updated.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet