Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade ethers from 6.13.1 to 6.13.2 #2836

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2024

Conversation

swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade ethers from 6.13.1 to 6.13.2.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 22 days ago.

Release notes
Package name: ethers from ethers GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

@swirlds-automation swirlds-automation requested review from AlfredoG87 and a team as code owners August 17, 2024 02:36
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 17, 2024

Acceptance Tests

  17 files  216 suites   27m 58s ⏱️
611 tests 607 ✔️ 4 💤 0
648 runs  644 ✔️ 4 💤 0

Results for commit 0e15633.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade ethers from 6.13.1 to 6.13.2.

See this package in npm:
ethers

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/json-rpc-relay/project/4c142326-fa3c-4252-9c35-19efc13dae91?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr

Signed-off-by: ebadiere <ebadiere@gmail.com>
@ebadiere ebadiere force-pushed the snyk-upgrade-36545f8917c141be02946805b5ab85f7 branch from 65ed335 to 0e15633 Compare August 19, 2024 16:09
Copy link

Copy link

Tests

       3 files     206 suites   1m 42s ⏱️
1 042 tests 1 041 ✔️ 1 💤 0
1 054 runs  1 053 ✔️ 1 💤 0

Results for commit 0e15633.

@ebadiere ebadiere requested a review from quiet-node August 19, 2024 17:24
@quiet-node quiet-node merged commit 289d55f into main Aug 19, 2024
35 of 38 checks passed
@quiet-node quiet-node deleted the snyk-upgrade-36545f8917c141be02946805b5ab85f7 branch August 19, 2024 17:25
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.89%. Comparing base (4ca9718) to head (0e15633).
Report is 4 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2836      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.14%   81.89%   +1.75%     
==========================================
  Files          30       46      +16     
  Lines        2709     3396     +687     
  Branches      582      716     +134     
==========================================
+ Hits         2171     2781     +610     
- Misses        344      386      +42     
- Partials      194      229      +35     
Flag Coverage Δ
relay 81.86% <ø> (+1.72%) ⬆️
server 80.82% <ø> (?)
ws-server 97.87% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 21 files with indirect coverage changes

ebadiere pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2024
fix: upgrade ethers from 6.13.1 to 6.13.2

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade ethers from 6.13.1 to 6.13.2.

See this package in npm:
ethers

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/json-rpc-relay/project/4c142326-fa3c-4252-9c35-19efc13dae91?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr

Signed-off-by: ebadiere <ebadiere@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: snyk-bot <snyk-bot@snyk.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants