You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In our production environments with existing large disks and large zpools, the set value of 2GB ZFS ARC max isn't honored, instead, the effective max was likely auto set to around 50% of the available system memory, e.g.,
This would then lead to much higher ARC memory usage than expected, e.g., 28.5GB as shown above.
The theory is in our init script, we do the two things in order
zpool import existing pool
set ZFS ARC max to 2GB
In case of a very large existing pool, ZFS will auto calculate and set ARC min/max. When the effective ARC min (here it's 2.9GB) is higher than the ARC max in subsequent attempted changes, the change is just ignored.
We also need to test that with large pool, we don't run into the issues here and here.
Steps to reproduce
check the description
Additional context
No response
Hedera network
No response
Version
v0.0.116-rc3
Operating system
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
In our production environments with existing large disks and large zpools, the set value of 2GB ZFS ARC max isn't honored, instead, the effective max was likely auto set to around 50% of the available system memory, e.g.,
This would then lead to much higher ARC memory usage than expected, e.g., 28.5GB as shown above.
The theory is in our init script, we do the two things in order
In case of a very large existing pool, ZFS will auto calculate and set ARC min/max. When the effective ARC min (here it's 2.9GB) is higher than the ARC max in subsequent attempted changes, the change is just ignored.
We also need to test that with large pool, we don't run into the issues here and here.
Steps to reproduce
check the description
Additional context
No response
Hedera network
No response
Version
v0.0.116-rc3
Operating system
None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: