-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prevent panic errors in tombstone GC #2582
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@sethvargo, could you, please, say if the changes acceptable to you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @ybubnov
This is the testutil server and should never be used for production uses. Pushing the ports into a map does not solve the issue though (and I've talked with DC about this). Global varies are not shared across multiple packages: https://gist.github.com/sethvargo/ebc696c9ed8f541a9887307115918181.
If more than one package imports this package, they both start with empty, independent maps. It's really a terrible problem that does not have a good solution 😦
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, I understand this play with ports allocation is necessary to speed up the tests invocation only, definitely it is not targeted for production usage.
But I did not precisely get the point with global variables that are not shared across multiple packages (I assume you are talking about the testing packages).
If so, then
go test
command will sequentially (one package by one) compile a standalone binary for each testing package and launch the tests in parallel only within the single package:So this map will be shared within a single binary. I also agree that proposed changes does not solve the problem (because there is clearly no solution). These changes to my mind reduce the probability of the case, when we allocate two same ports while testing the single package.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, as long as we accept the tradeoffs, I'm okay with this.