Mock status - Complete migration

[didoo]

📌 Summary

This is a follow-up of #314, where we updated only some of the dummy documentation pages (and components).

🛠️ Detailed description

In this PR I have:

• updated remaining pages and components to use the new mock-status approach for mocking visual states

---

👀 How to review

👉 Review by files changed

Reviewer's checklist:

• +1 Percy if applicable

💬 Please consider using conventional comments when reviewing this PR.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Updated
hds-components	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	May 26, 2022 at 7:48PM (UTC)
hds-flight-website	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	May 26, 2022 at 7:48PM (UTC)

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: bfbe948

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[Dhaulagiri]

Seems to work ok in the review app

Non-blocking ❓

I feel like I'm often the changeset 👮‍♂️, but I think you could argue we should include a changeset for these since they do touch public code and could introduce bugs customers might be confused by without a changelog entry 🤷. What do you think?

[didoo]

I feel like I'm often the changeset 👮‍♂️, but I think you could argue we should include a changeset for these since they do touch public code and could introduce bugs customers might be confused by without a changelog entry 🤷. What do you think?

@Dhaulagiri I swear, this time I thought of it (the changeset) and I concluded that it's not necessary (that's why I intentionally removed it from the "Reviewer's checklist:").

[Dhaulagiri]

👍 thanks for letting me work through this out loud