CompoundMultiIndex in the case of AllowMissing #95

[Novicei]

I think that in the case of AllowMissing, there is a certain problem with the processing logic of CompoundMultiIndex. It's probably where I modified it.

[Novicei]

I think that only in the case of AllowMissing, the case when depth == len(builder)-1 will be added to the output. If this is not the case, it should be added to the output when depth==len(c.Indexs).

[Amier3]

Hey @Novicei

Thanks for raising this PR 😄! I see where you attempted to fix #95 , but it looks like there's a lot more code in the commit that's unrelated to the CompoundMultiIndex issue. Could you submit a clean PR with just the changes related to that issue?

[hashicorp-cla]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[Novicei]

Hey @Novicei

Thanks for raising this PR 😄! I see where you attempted to fix #95 , but it looks like there's a lot more code in the commit that's unrelated to the CompoundMultiIndex issue. Could you submit a clean PR with just the changes related to that issue?

Sorry, I've been very busy lately, it may take a while