Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: rephrase beginning of paragraph "Dynamic Attributes Processing" #701

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 1, 2024

Conversation

bschaatsbergen
Copy link
Member

@bschaatsbergen bschaatsbergen commented Oct 1, 2024

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Bruno Schaatsbergen <git@bschaatsbergen.com>
@crw
Copy link
Contributor

crw commented Oct 1, 2024

https://www.google.com/search?q=a+priori

relating to or denoting reasoning or knowledge which proceeds from theoretical deduction rather than from observation or experience.
"a priori assumptions about human nature"

Probably that phrase should be in italics to denote the latin legalistic meaning. That said, I think if the sentence works as well without it, we should remove it.

@crw
Copy link
Contributor

crw commented Oct 1, 2024

The more I think about it, the more I think a priori this should be removed.

@crw crw merged commit 2eb163f into main Oct 1, 2024
13 checks passed
@crw crw deleted the d/fix-typo branch October 1, 2024 15:59
@bschaatsbergen
Copy link
Member Author

bschaatsbergen commented Oct 1, 2024

https://www.google.com/search?q=a+priori

relating to or denoting reasoning or knowledge which proceeds from theoretical deduction rather than from observation or experience.
"a priori assumptions about human nature"

Probably that phrase should be in italics to denote the latin legalistic meaning. That said, I think if the sentence works as well without it, we should remove it.

TIL, thanks! 😃

@bschaatsbergen bschaatsbergen changed the title docs: fix typo under "Dynamic Attributes Processing" docs: rephrase beginning of paragraph "Dynamic Attributes Processing" Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants