Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Batch Job Garbage Collection #3982

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 16, 2018
Merged

Batch Job Garbage Collection #3982

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 16, 2018

Conversation

dadgar
Copy link
Contributor

@dadgar dadgar commented Mar 14, 2018

This PR introduces a new endpoint to batch deregister jobs. This allows the
garbage collector to remove many jobs more efficiently.

if remaining <= available {
for _, job := range jobs[submittedJobs:] {
jns := structs.NamespacedID{ID: job.ID, Namespace: job.Namespace}
req.Jobs[jns] = option
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Little nervous about sharing a pointer to the same struct here, but nothing mutates it and it seems unlikely anything would ever go back through and mutate it so I think it's safe to leave.

return err
}

// If the job is periodic or parameterized, we don't create an eval.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The scheduler doesn't do anything for those job types. It does work for the derived batch jobs from them

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah sure, that makes sense. Maybe in future comments add a because ... clause as what the code is doing is fairly obvious, but why it's doing it is not.

}

// Lookup the job
snap, err := j.srv.fsm.State().Snapshot()
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do this once outside the loop

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 9, 2023

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 9, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants