Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: updates for CSI plugin improvements for 1.3.0 #12466

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 5, 2022
Merged

Conversation

@tgross tgross marked this pull request as ready for review April 5, 2022 19:46
@tgross tgross added this to the 1.3.0 milestone Apr 5, 2022
@tgross tgross added theme/docs Documentation issues and enhancements backport/1.1 labels Apr 5, 2022
@tgross tgross changed the title docs: updates for Nomad 1.3.0 CSI docs: updates for CSI plugin improvements for 1.3.0 Apr 5, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@DerekStrickland DerekStrickland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

Copy link
Member

@shoenig shoenig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! just the one thought

tasks last.

Typically, you should run node plugins as Nomad `system` jobs so they
can mount volumes on any client in a datacenter. Controller plugins
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
can mount volumes on any client in a datacenter. Controller plugins
can mount volumes on any client in a cluster. Controller plugins

Unless datacenter is intentional (?)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was intentional, because a system job runs across the specific datacenter they're deployed in and not the whole cluster. But on second thought there can be more than 1 DC for a given system job and that makes it read awkwardly. Maybe "can mount volumes on any client where they are running"?

@shoenig shoenig mentioned this pull request Jun 2, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 120 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Oct 16, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
theme/docs Documentation issues and enhancements
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants