Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add primary key to keylist response #611

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 17, 2020
Merged

Conversation

hanshasselberg
Copy link
Member

This PR modifies the key list response and adds a field for the primary key of a node. They will be accumulated similarly to the other keys.

@hanshasselberg hanshasselberg changed the title add primary keys to keylist add primary key to keylist Aug 17, 2020
@hanshasselberg hanshasselberg changed the title add primary key to keylist add primary key to keylist response Aug 17, 2020
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ func TestSerfQueries_keyListResponseWithCorrectSize(t *testing.T) {
{expected: 0, hasMsg: false, resp: nodeKeyResponse{}},
{expected: 1, hasMsg: false, resp: nodeKeyResponse{Keys: []string{"KfCPZAKdgHUOdb202afZfE8EbdZqj4+ReTbfJUkfKsg="}}},
// has 50 keys which makes the response bigger than 1024 bytes.
{expected: 19, hasMsg: true, resp: nodeKeyResponse{Keys: []string{
{expected: 18, hasMsg: true, resp: nodeKeyResponse{Keys: []string{
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This changes because the primary key was added to the response. Which is why less keys fit into the message.

Copy link
Member

@mkeeler mkeeler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

serf/keymanager.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@hanshasselberg hanshasselberg merged commit 5383e20 into master Aug 17, 2020
hanshasselberg added a commit to hashicorp/consul that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2020
During gossip encryption key rotation it would be nice to be able to see if all nodes are using the same key. This PR adds another field to the json response from `GET v1/operator/keyring` which lists the primary keys in use per dc. That way an operator can tell when a key was successfully setup as primary key.

Based on hashicorp/serf#611 to add primary key to list keyring output:

```json
[
  {
    "WAN": true,
    "Datacenter": "dc2",
    "Segment": "",
    "Keys": {
      "0OuM4oC3Os18OblWiBbZUaHA7Hk+tNs/6nhNYtaNduM=": 6,
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 6
    },
    "PrimaryKeys": {
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 6
    },
    "NumNodes": 6
  },
  {
    "WAN": false,
    "Datacenter": "dc2",
    "Segment": "",
    "Keys": {
      "0OuM4oC3Os18OblWiBbZUaHA7Hk+tNs/6nhNYtaNduM=": 8,
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 8
    },
    "PrimaryKeys": {
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 8
    },
    "NumNodes": 8
  },
  {
    "WAN": false,
    "Datacenter": "dc1",
    "Segment": "",
    "Keys": {
      "0OuM4oC3Os18OblWiBbZUaHA7Hk+tNs/6nhNYtaNduM=": 3,
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 8
    },
    "PrimaryKeys": {
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 8
    },
    "NumNodes": 8
  }
]
```

I intentionally did not change the CLI output because I didn't find a good way of displaying this information. There are a couple of options that we could implement later:
* add a flag to show the primary keys
* add a flag to show json output

Fixes #3393.
hashicorp-ci pushed a commit to hashicorp/consul that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2020
During gossip encryption key rotation it would be nice to be able to see if all nodes are using the same key. This PR adds another field to the json response from `GET v1/operator/keyring` which lists the primary keys in use per dc. That way an operator can tell when a key was successfully setup as primary key.

Based on hashicorp/serf#611 to add primary key to list keyring output:

```json
[
  {
    "WAN": true,
    "Datacenter": "dc2",
    "Segment": "",
    "Keys": {
      "0OuM4oC3Os18OblWiBbZUaHA7Hk+tNs/6nhNYtaNduM=": 6,
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 6
    },
    "PrimaryKeys": {
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 6
    },
    "NumNodes": 6
  },
  {
    "WAN": false,
    "Datacenter": "dc2",
    "Segment": "",
    "Keys": {
      "0OuM4oC3Os18OblWiBbZUaHA7Hk+tNs/6nhNYtaNduM=": 8,
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 8
    },
    "PrimaryKeys": {
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 8
    },
    "NumNodes": 8
  },
  {
    "WAN": false,
    "Datacenter": "dc1",
    "Segment": "",
    "Keys": {
      "0OuM4oC3Os18OblWiBbZUaHA7Hk+tNs/6nhNYtaNduM=": 3,
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 8
    },
    "PrimaryKeys": {
      "SINm887hKTzmMWeBNKTJReaTLX3mBEJKriDyt88Ad+g=": 8
    },
    "NumNodes": 8
  }
]
```

I intentionally did not change the CLI output because I didn't find a good way of displaying this information. There are a couple of options that we could implement later:
* add a flag to show the primary keys
* add a flag to show json output

Fixes #3393.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants