Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for 'create' timeout on Spot Fleet #922

Closed
jessecollier opened this issue Jun 20, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #993
Closed

Add support for 'create' timeout on Spot Fleet #922

jessecollier opened this issue Jun 20, 2017 · 1 comment · Fixed by #993
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope.

Comments

@jessecollier
Copy link
Contributor

Hi there,

Frequently we are seeing issues with running terraform apply to create a spot fleet. It times out after 1m yet is actually successful shortly after. We have retries on our applies, so it ends up creating several fleets.

* aws_spot_fleet_request.worker_slave: Error requesting spot fleet: timeout while waiting for state to become 'success' (timeout: 1m0s)

We looked at adding https://www.terraform.io/docs/configuration/resources.html#timeouts
However it is not supported for this resources.

@Ninir Ninir added the feature label Jun 23, 2017
@radeksimko radeksimko added enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope. and removed feature labels Jun 25, 2017
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 12, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 12, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
enhancement Requests to existing resources that expand the functionality or scope.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants