Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RDS Aurora storage type back to default #41711

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

carloscastrojumo
Copy link

Description

As stated in the provider documentation for RDS storage_type:

Valid values are: "", aurora-iopt1 (Aurora DB Clusters); io1, io2 (Multi-AZ DB Clusters). Default: "" (Aurora DB Clusters); io1 (Multi-AZ DB Clusters).

However, when creating/modifying an Aurora DB Clusters with aurora-iopt1 and then go back to the default, ie: remove the value or set it to "", the provider does not actually revert back to aurora storage type.

References

storage_type: terraform-provider-aws definition for RDS storage_type
ModifyAPICluster: AWS ModifyAPI Cluster API

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Community Guidelines

This comment is added to every new Pull Request to provide quick reference to how the Terraform AWS Provider is maintained. Please review the information below, and thank you for contributing to the community that keeps the provider thriving! 🚀

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this Pull Request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize it.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for additional information on how the maintainers handle prioritization.
  • Please do not leave +1 or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions; they generate extra noise for others following the Pull Request and do not help prioritize the request.

Pull Request Authors

  • Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
  • Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

@github-actions github-actions bot added needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. service/rds Issues and PRs that pertain to the rds service. size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Mar 6, 2025
@carloscastrojumo carloscastrojumo marked this pull request as ready for review March 6, 2025 22:48
@carloscastrojumo carloscastrojumo requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2025 22:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-triage Waiting for first response or review from a maintainer. service/rds Issues and PRs that pertain to the rds service. size/S Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant