-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
resource/aws_api_gateway_model: Support resource import #5572
Conversation
* Support, test, and document resource import make testacc TEST=./aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSAPIGatewayModel_' ==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements... TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -run=TestAccAWSAPIGatewayModel_ -timeout 120m === RUN TestAccAWSAPIGatewayModel_basic --- PASS: TestAccAWSAPIGatewayModel_basic (14.34s) PASS ok github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws 14.981s
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one minor 🤔 but otherwise LGTM 👍
return nil, err | ||
} | ||
|
||
d.SetId(aws.StringValue(output.Id)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why not call d.SetId and then the Read function? 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In this case, the model ID is actually worthless for read. At some point we should switch the resource ID to be the REST API ID and model name instead of the model ID, but that could be perceived as a breaking change.
This has been released in version 1.33.0 of the AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. |
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks! |
Reference: #558
Changes proposed in this pull request:
Output from acceptance testing: