-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
resource/aws_route53_record: Switch allow_overwrite default from true to false #7734
Conversation
… to false References: * #3895 * #2926 Previously, the `aws_route53_record` resource did not follow standard Terraform conventions of requiring existing infrastructure to be imported into Terraform's state for management, which meant operators could unexpectedly affect that existing infrastructure. In version 1.10.0, we introduced the `allow_overwrite` argument so operators could opt into the upcoming import requirement and force the Terraform resource during resource creation to error if it attempted to create a Route53 record that previously existed. Here we make the breaking change to switch the default resource behavior to error on creation for existing records. Operators can opt out of the new behavior by enabling the flag, but it is marked as deprecated for removal in the next major version and will display the deprecation warning when used to signal that workflows should be adjusted if necessary. Output from acceptance testing: ``` --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_Alias_Elb (319.83s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_Alias_S3 (123.47s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_Alias_Uppercase (184.67s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_Alias_VpcEndpoint (450.17s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_AliasChange (157.29s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_allowOverwrite (365.48s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic (130.53s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_basic_fqdn (146.30s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_caaSupport (177.87s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_disappears (107.58s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_disappears_MultipleRecords (247.77s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_empty (115.48s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_failover (204.75s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_generatesSuffix (180.48s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_geolocation_basic (196.58s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_importBasic (174.28s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_importUnderscored (114.40s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_latency_basic (173.99s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_longTXTrecord (114.97s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_multivalue_answer_basic (197.09s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_SetIdentifierChange (206.47s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_spfSupport (152.57s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_txtSupport (170.00s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_TypeChange (220.81s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_alias (278.61s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_weighted_basic (112.68s) --- PASS: TestAccAWSRoute53Record_wildcard (216.04s) ```
e60b809
to
a8c6bdf
Compare
|
||
### allow_overwrite Default Value Change | ||
|
||
The resource now requires existing Route 53 Records to be imported into the Terraform state for management unless the `allow_overwrite` argument is enabled. The `allow_overwrite` flag is considered deprecated for removal in the next major version of the Terraform AWS Provider (version 3.0.0). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggestion: don't name a specific version, just say "a future version". Then if you forget for 3.0.0, you didn't break a promise.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 Great suggestion
…nt as future major version, not necessarily next
This picks up a bunch of upstream improvements [1] including [2] to address [3]. Generated with a manual Gopkg.toml edit followed by: $ cd terraform/exec/plugins $ dep ensure with: $ dep version dep: version : v0.5.1 build date : 2019-03-20 git hash : faa61893 go version : go1.10.3 go compiler : gc platform : linux/amd64 features : ImportDuringSolve=false The aws-iam-authenticator pin gets us closer to [4], although (1) I don't know why dep isn't figuring that out for itself and (2) they got rid of their 0.3.1 tag [5]? Anyway, this avoids: $ hack/build.sh ... # github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/terraform/exec/plugins/vendor/github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws pkg/terraform/exec/plugins/vendor/github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws/data_source_aws_eks_cluster_auth.go:35:38: too many arguments in call to token.NewGenerator have (bool) want () ... The AWS SDK pin gets us closer to [6] and avoids: $ hack/build.sh ... # github.com/openshift/installer/pkg/terraform/exec/plugins/vendor/github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws pkg/terraform/exec/plugins/vendor/github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/aws/structure.go:4801:7: spec.ServiceNames undefined (type *appmesh.VirtualRouterSpec has no field or method ServiceNames) ... The = prefixes in Gopkg.toml settle things down, because [7]: Note: When you specify a version without an operator, dep automatically uses the ^ operator by default. dep ensure will interpret the given version as the min-boundary of a range... [1]: https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/blob/v2.2.0/CHANGELOG.md [2]: hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws#7734 (v2.0.0) [3]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659970 [4]: https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/blob/v2.2.0/go.mod#L27 [5]: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/aws-iam-authenticator/tags [6]: https://github.com/terraform-providers/terraform-provider-aws/blob/v2.2.0/go.mod#L7 [7]: https://golang.github.io/dep/docs/Gopkg.toml.html#version-rules
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks! |
Closes #3895
Reference: #2926
Previously, the
aws_route53_record
resource did not follow standard Terraform conventions of requiring existing infrastructure to be imported into Terraform's state for management, which meant operators could unexpectedly affect that existing infrastructure. In version 1.10.0, we introduced theallow_overwrite
argument so operators could opt into the upcoming import requirement and force the Terraform resource during resource creation to error if it attempted to create a Route53 record that previously existed.Here we make the breaking change to switch the default resource behavior to error on creation for existing records. Operators can opt out of the new behavior by setting
allow_overwrite = true
, but it is marked as deprecated for removal in the next major version and will display the deprecation warning when used to signal that workflows should be adjusted if necessary.Output from acceptance testing: