Add support tags attribute for resource_aws_media_package_channel

[teraken0509]

Community Note

• Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" comments, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

Fixes #7813

Changes proposed in this pull request:

• Add support tags attribute

Output from acceptance testing:

$ make testacc TEST=./aws TESTARGS='-run=TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_'
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./aws -v -parallel 20 -run=TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_ -timeout 120m
=== RUN   TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_basic
=== RUN   TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_description
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_description
=== RUN   TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_tags
=== PAUSE TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_tags
=== CONT  TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_basic
=== CONT  TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_description
=== CONT  TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_tags
--- PASS: TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_basic (35.25s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_description (56.33s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_tags (79.10s)
PASS
ok  	github.com/terraform-providers/tmp-terraform-provider-aws/aws	79.216s

[bflad]

Looks great, thanks @kterada0509 🚀 (TravisCI failures related to #7993)

--- PASS: TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_basic (20.26s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_description (31.86s)
--- PASS: TestAccAWSMediaPackageChannel_tags (37.71s)

[bflad]

This has been released in version 2.3.0 of the Terraform AWS provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

[ghost]

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!