Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs/provider: Add backwards compatibility note to top of resources where the AWS service is in preview #8035

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2019

Conversation

bflad
Copy link
Contributor

@bflad bflad commented Mar 21, 2019

Community Note

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original pull request comment to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" comments, they generate extra noise for pull request followers and do not help prioritize the request

References: #7659

Backwards compatibility with AWS services in preview is best effort. Here we add a note to affected Terraform resources since they may not follow our normal compatibility promises as outlined on the HashiCorp Blog and Extending Terraform documentation. This notice mainly applies to Security Hub at the moment, but could apply to MSK (Kafka) if that is added before GA as well.

…here the AWS service is in preview

References: #7659

Backwards compatibility with AWS services in preview is best effort. Here we add a note to affected Terraform resources since they may not follow our normal compatibility promises as outlined on the [HashiCorp Blog](https://www.hashicorp.com/blog/hashicorp-terraform-provider-versioning) and [Extending Terraform documentation](https://www.terraform.io/docs/extend/best-practices/versioning.html). This notice mainly applies to Security Hub at the moment, but could apply to MSK (Kafka) if that is added before GA as well.
@bflad bflad added documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. service/securityhub Issues and PRs that pertain to the securityhub service. labels Mar 21, 2019
@bflad bflad requested a review from a team March 21, 2019 13:14
@ghost ghost added the size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. label Mar 21, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@nywilken nywilken left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bflad bflad added this to the v2.3.0 milestone Mar 21, 2019
@bflad bflad merged commit 06b0fdd into master Mar 21, 2019
@bflad bflad deleted the d-preview-service-warnings branch March 21, 2019 16:49
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 31, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
documentation Introduces or discusses updates to documentation. service/securityhub Issues and PRs that pertain to the securityhub service. size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants