Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_kubernetes_cluster forces redeployment of recent cluster due to windows_profile #6235

Closed
EPinci opened this issue Mar 24, 2020 · 6 comments · Fixed by #6095
Closed

Comments

@EPinci
Copy link

EPinci commented Mar 24, 2020

Community Note

  • Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request
  • If you are interested in working on this issue or have submitted a pull request, please leave a comment

Terraform (and AzureRM Provider) Version

TF v0.12.24 - AzureRM 2.2.0

Affected Resource(s)

azure_kubernetes_cluster

Terraform Configuration Files

Any recently deployed cluster with no "windows_profile" gets provisioned fine.
On any subsequent run, TF tries to redeploy the cluster referencing a change in that block.

      - windows_profile {
          - admin_username = "azureuser" -> null # forces replacement
        }

References

@baosen
Copy link

baosen commented Mar 24, 2020

A simple workaround for this issue can be made by adding this small code snippet to the resource:

 lifecycle {
    ignore_changes = [
      windows_profile,
    ]
  }

@Cyanopus
Copy link

This behavior can be seen in AzureRM 2,3 as well. Its not affecting previously created resources before Azure done this change on the API. Which means that if you've provisioned the cluster a week ago you are most likely safe in the resource.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 9, 2020

This has been released in version 2.5.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 2.5.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@tscully49
Copy link

Is this going to be patched for the azurerm provider 1.44.0? My company uses that version and we are running into the same issue.

@Cyanopus
Copy link

@tscully49 You will probably have to upgrade to 2.5.0

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 6, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 6, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.