Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_function_app: Support full site_config as with app_service. #2138

Closed

Conversation

torresdal
Copy link
Contributor

  • Reference same schema as in AppService
  • Use Same expand/flatten as in AppService
  • Added integration test for ip_restrictions

* Reference same schema as in AppService
* Use Same expand/flatten as in AppService
* Added integration test for ip_restrictions
@ghost ghost added the size/L label Oct 23, 2018
@torresdal torresdal changed the title [azurerm_function_app] Support full site_config as with app_service. azurerm_function_app: Support full site_config as with app_service. Oct 24, 2018
@katbyte katbyte modified the milestones: 1.19.0, 1.18.0 Oct 25, 2018
Copy link
Collaborator

@katbyte katbyte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @torresdal,

Thank you for this contribution! It LGTM aside from could we get some more tests to validate the other properties can be set & then updated?

TestAccAzureRMFunctionApp_siteConig -> TestAccAzureRMFunctionApp_siteConfigUpdate

@ghost ghost added size/M documentation and removed size/L labels Jan 31, 2019
@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff modified the milestones: 2.0.0, 1.23.0 Feb 7, 2019
@tombuildsstuff
Copy link
Contributor

hey @torresdal

Since we've not heard back from you here (and there's outstanding comments/a rebase required) - I'm going to close this PR for the moment. If you (or someone else in the future) can fix those up, we'll be happy to take another look and add support for this functionality - whilst I'm closing this PR I'd like to thank you for this contribution :)

Thanks!

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 8, 2019

This has been released in version 1.23.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
	version = "~> 1.23.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost ghost removed the waiting-response label Mar 8, 2019
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 30, 2019

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 30, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants