Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

azurerm_private_endpoint - Remove internal lock on subnet while processing private endpoint #26006

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024

Conversation

lonegunmanb
Copy link
Contributor

@lonegunmanb lonegunmanb commented May 17, 2024

Remove internal lock on subnet while processing private endpoint since the API issue no longer exist under API version 2023-09-01

This pr should solve #26005

Community Note

  • Please vote on this PR by adding a 👍 reaction to the original PR to help the community and maintainers prioritize for review
  • Please do not leave "+1" or "me too" comments, they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize for review

Description

PR Checklist

  • I have followed the guidelines in our Contributing Documentation.
  • I have checked to ensure there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same update/change.
  • I have checked if my changes close any open issues. If so please include appropriate closing keywords below.
  • I have updated/added Documentation as required written in a helpful and kind way to assist users that may be unfamiliar with the resource / data source.
  • I have used a meaningful PR title to help maintainers and other users understand this change and help prevent duplicate work.
    For example: “resource_name_here - description of change e.g. adding property new_property_name_here

Changes to existing Resource / Data Source

  • I have added an explanation of what my changes do and why I'd like you to include them (This may be covered by linking to an issue above, but may benefit from additional explanation).
  • I have written new tests for my resource or datasource changes & updated any relevent documentation.
  • I have successfully run tests with my changes locally. If not, please provide details on testing challenges that prevented you running the tests.
  • (For changes that include a state migration only). I have manually tested the migration path between relevant versions of the provider.

Testing

  • My submission includes Test coverage as described in the Contribution Guide and the tests pass. (if this is not possible for any reason, please include details of why you did or could not add test coverage)

A new acc test TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleInstancesWithLinkAlias has been added to verify creating multiple private endpoint with private link alias is good.

=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_basic
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_basic
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_basic (376.22s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateTag
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateTag
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateTag
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateTag (519.56s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateNicName
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateNicName
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateNicName
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateNicName (589.14s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_requestMessage
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_requestMessage
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_requestMessage
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_requestMessage (426.08s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneGroup
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneGroup
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneGroup
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneGroup (466.67s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneRename
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneRename
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneRename
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneRename (559.39s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneUpdate
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneUpdate
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneUpdate
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneUpdate (611.53s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_statiIpAddress
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_statiIpAddress
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_statiIpAddress
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_statiIpAddress (345.48s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneRemove
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneRemove
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneRemove
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateDnsZoneRemove (594.01s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateConnectionAlias
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateConnectionAlias
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateConnectionAlias
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_privateConnectionAlias (325.23s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateToPrivateConnectionAlias
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateToPrivateConnectionAlias
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateToPrivateConnectionAlias
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_updateToPrivateConnectionAlias (445.43s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleInstances
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleInstances
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleInstances
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleInstances (322.07s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleIpConfigurations
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleIpConfigurations
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleIpConfigurations
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleIpConfigurations (455.78s)
=== RUN TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleInstancesWithLinkAlias
=== PAUSE TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleInstancesWithLinkAlias
=== CONT TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleInstancesWithLinkAlias
--- PASS: TestAccPrivateEndpoint_multipleInstancesWithLinkAlias (364.07s)
PASS

Change Log

Below please provide what should go into the changelog (if anything) conforming to the Changelog Format documented here.

  • azurerm_private_endpoint - Remove internal lock on subnet while processing private endpoint [GH-00000]

This is a (please select all that apply):

  • Bug Fix
  • New Feature (ie adding a service, resource, or data source)
  • Enhancement
  • Breaking Change

Related Issue(s)

Fixes #26005

Note

If this PR changes meaningfully during the course of review please update the title and description as required.

Copy link
Member

@jackofallops jackofallops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @lonegunmanb - looks to be a compilation error in the merge branch for this PR relating to subnetId being unused. Can you rebase and check so I can run the tests on CI?

Thanks!

@lonegunmanb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hello @jackofallops I've rebased the branch with latest main branch then fixed the compilation error, would you please take another look? Thanks!

Copy link
Member

@jackofallops jackofallops left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @lonegunmanb - This LGTM now 👍

@jackofallops
Copy link
Member

Tests look good

image

@jackofallops jackofallops merged commit 10877db into hashicorp:main Jun 13, 2024
31 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v3.108.0 milestone Jun 13, 2024
jackofallops added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2024
dduportal referenced this pull request in jenkins-infra/azure Jun 18, 2024
<Actions>
<action
id="f410411e63aff4bb73a81c2aec1d373cf8a903e63b30dee2006b0030d8a94cc8">
        <h3>Bump Terraform `azurerm` provider version</h3>
<details
id="1d9343c012f5434ac9fe8a98135bae3667b399259be16d9b14302ea3bd424a24">
            <summary>Update Terraform lock file</summary>
<p>changes detected:&#xA;&#x9;&#34;hashicorp/azurerm&#34; updated from
&#34;3.107.0&#34; to &#34;3.108.0&#34; in file
&#34;.terraform.lock.hcl&#34;</p>
            <details>
                <summary>3.108.0</summary>
<pre>Changelog retrieved
from:&#xA;&#x9;https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/releases/tag/v3.108.0&#xA;FEATURES:&#xA;&#xA;*
**New Data Source:** `azurerm_role_management_policy`
([#25900](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#25900
**New Resource:** `azurerm_role_management_policy`
([#25900](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/25900))&#xA;&#xA;ENHANCEMENTS:&#xA;&#xA;*
provider: support subscription ID hinting when using Azure CLI
authentication
([#26282](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26282
`serviceconnector`: updating to use API Version `2024-04-01`
([#26248](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26248
`azurerm_container_groups` - can now be created with a User Assigned
Identity when running Windows
([#26308](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26308
`azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - updating the
`network_profile.network_policy` property to `azure` and `calico` when
it hasn&#39;t been previously set is supported
([#26176](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26176
`azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - respect Pod Distruption Budgets when
rotating the `default_node_pool`
([#26274](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26274
`azurerm_lb_backend_address_pool` - support for the `synchronous_mode`
property
([#26309](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26309
`azurerm_private_endpoint` - support symultaneous creation of multiple
resources of this type per subnet
([#26006](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26006))&#xA;&#xA;BUG
FIXES:&#xA;&#xA;* `azurerm_express_route_circuit_peering`,
`azurerm_express_route_circuit`, `azurerm_express_route_gateway`,
`azurerm_express_route_port` - split create and update
([#26237](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26237
`azurerm_lb_backend_address_pool_address` - when using this resource,
values are no longer reset on `azurerm_lb_backend_address_pool`
([#26264](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26264
`azurerm_route_filter` - spliting create and update so lifecycle ignore
changes works correctly
([#26266](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26266
`azurerm_route_server` - spliting create and update so lifecycle ignore
changes works correctly
([#26266](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26266
`azurerm_synapse_workspace` - updates the client used in all operations
of `azurerm_synapse_workspace_sql_aad_admin` to prevent this resource
from modifying the same resource as
`azurerm_synapse_workspace_aad_admin`
([#26317](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26317
`azurerm_virtual_network` - correctly parse network securty group IDs
([#26283](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26283))&#xA;&#xA;DEPRECATIONS:&#xA;&#xA;*
Data Source: `azurerm_network_interface` - the `enable_ip_forwarding`
and `enable_accelerated_networking` properties have been deprecated and
superseded by the `ip_forwarding_enabled` and
`accelerated_networking_enabled` properties
([#26293](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26293
`azurerm_api_management` - the `policy` block has been deprecated is
superseded by the `azurerm_api_management_policy` resource
([#26305](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26305
`azurerm_kubernetes_cluster` - the `ebpf_data_plane` property has been
deprecated and superseded by the `network_data_plane` property
([#26251](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26251
`azurerm_network_interface` - the `enable_ip_forwarding` and
`enable_accelerated_networking` properties have been deprecated and
superseded by the `ip_forwarding_enabled` and
`accelerated_networking_enabled` properties
([#26293](hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm#26293
`azurerm_synapse_workspace` - the `aad_admin` and `sql_aad_admin` blocks
have been deprecated and superseded by the
`azurerm_synapse_workspace_aad_admin` and
`azurerm_synapse_workspace_sql_aad_admin` resources
([#26317](https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-azurerm/issues/26317))&#xA;&#xA;&#xA;</pre>
            </details>
        </details>
<a
href="https://infra.ci.jenkins.io/job/updatecli/job/azure/job/main/244/">Jenkins
pipeline link</a>
    </action>
</Actions>

---

<table>
  <tr>
    <td width="77">
<img src="https://www.updatecli.io/images/updatecli.png" alt="Updatecli
logo" width="50" height="50">
    </td>
    <td>
      <p>
Created automatically by <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/">Updatecli</a>
      </p>
      <details><summary>Options:</summary>
        <br />
<p>Most of Updatecli configuration is done via <a
href="https://www.updatecli.io/docs/prologue/quick-start/">its
manifest(s)</a>.</p>
        <ul>
<li>If you close this pull request, Updatecli will automatically reopen
it, the next time it runs.</li>
<li>If you close this pull request and delete the base branch, Updatecli
will automatically recreate it, erasing all previous commits made.</li>
        </ul>
        <p>
Feel free to report any issues at <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/issues">github.com/updatecli/updatecli</a>.<br
/>
If you find this tool useful, do not hesitate to star <a
href="https://github.com/updatecli/updatecli/stargazers">our GitHub
repository</a> as a sign of appreciation, and/or to tell us directly on
our <a
href="https://matrix.to/#/#Updatecli_community:gitter.im">chat</a>!
        </p>
      </details>
    </td>
  </tr>
</table>

Co-authored-by: Jenkins Infra Bot (updatecli) <60776566+jenkins-infra-bot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active contributions.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 14, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Support for creating multiple private endpoints simultaneously
2 participants