Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

terraform creating GCE vm doesn't support multi nic configuration. #82

Closed
hashibot opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 5 comments · Fixed by #289
Closed

terraform creating GCE vm doesn't support multi nic configuration. #82

hashibot opened this issue Jun 13, 2017 · 5 comments · Fixed by #289

Comments

@hashibot
Copy link

This issue was originally opened by @gandhams as hashicorp/terraform#13564. It was migrated here as part of the provider split. The original body of the issue is below.


Hi, Any possibility this issue has been fixed. I verified that multiple nics (each nic in different networks) can be added to the same vm using the cli.

gcloud alpha compute instances create pavm-ssaha-swap-1 --can-ip-forward --network-interface subnet=mgmt-subnet --network-interface subnet=data1-subnet --network-interface subnet=data2-subnet --machine-type=n1-standard-2 --image pavm-guestos-feature-image --zone=us-west1-a --tags=pa-vm

@satishmohan
Copy link

Hi
It would be great to have this supported - we need this feature in GCP too 👍 .

Thanks!
Satish

@danawillow
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for letting us know, @satishmohan! Looks like this feature is still in beta, so it's currently blocked on #93.

@satishmohan
Copy link

Thanks @danawillow . I think we have access to the beta program of GCP at our company - so if somebody has a work-in-progress diff - I could help test this out?

If not I could also help coming up with a diff for this - if somebody could give me a few pointers of where to modify the provider code :-)

Thanks!
Satish

@danawillow
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @satishmohan, the issue I linked to is actually about Terraform in GCP supporting beta features as a whole- it's actually a surprising amount of engineering work to offer that support. We're making good progress on that but at this point all I can ask is for your patience :)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 31, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 31, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants