Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timeout on provisioning using azurerm #9567

Closed
girishramnani opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Timeout on provisioning using azurerm #9567

girishramnani opened this issue Oct 24, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@girishramnani
Copy link

Hi there,

I am trying to provision 4 servers using azurerm and an i/o timeout occurs when i am trying to provision the servers.
I have configured a remote state and hence terraform tries to destroy the infrastructure created in the past. So even before it reaches the creation of the current infrastructure the error occurs. This is the gist of the output https://gist.github.com/d93bef6830d0cf6a5ad6b279750c4b56

One thing I noticed is if i do not configure a remote-state, the servers get provisioned a work nicely.

So after getting this i/o timeout error i try to deprovision ( just so that maybe terraform gets to a clean state) and in that case connection timed out error occurs.
This is the gist of the output https://gist.github.com/girishramnani/0e80c9ef7582e13f07cebc1438f5fdd2. I am running terraform on an aws instance so this issue is not related to the internet speed.

Terraform Version - 0.7.4

Expected behavior

The servers should be provisioned

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 10, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 10, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants