-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Timeout on provisioning using azurerm #22
Comments
Hi @girishramnani, We have also released a Terraform offering in the Azure Marketplace that leverages this support to help you share remote state as well as share identity via Azure Managed Service Identity. As this is an old issue which should now be fixed with #351, I will close it over the next few days if I don't hear back from you by then. Thanks, |
Sure
…On Tue 17 Apr, 2018, 2:48 AM Arun Chandrasekhar, ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @girishramnani <https://github.com/girishramnani>,
Thanks for reporting this issue. Sorry about the delay in replying to the
same. Terraform has had native support for azurerm as a remote state
backend from November 2017 as mentioned in #351
<#351>.
So this should be supported from 0.10.6 of Terraform.
We have also released a Terraform <http://aka.ms/aztf> offering in the
Azure Marketplace that leverages this support to help you share remote
state as well as share identity via Azure Managed Service Identity.
As this is an old issue which should now be fixed with #351
<#351>,
I will close it over the next few days if I don't hear back from you by
then.
Thanks,
Arun Chandrasekhar
Principal Program Manager - Azure OSS Integrations
https://twitter.com/rcarunmsft
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGP5tNxTprRZGIWgWYgTgqKucUfXUaUjks5tpQq3gaJpZM4N42q_>
.
|
So @girishramnani, Should I close this issue? |
Sure go ahead.
Thank you.
…On Tue 17 Apr, 2018, 3:06 AM Arun Chandrasekhar, ***@***.***> wrote:
So @girishramnani <https://github.com/girishramnani>, Should I close this
issue?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#22 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGP5tEX6IYvYUhjOLsUxuGR4boPkxIOTks5tpQ7BgaJpZM4N42q_>
.
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks! |
This issue was originally opened by @girishramnani as hashicorp/terraform#9567. It was migrated here as part of the provider split. The original body of the issue is below.
Hi there,
I am trying to provision 4 servers using azurerm and an i/o timeout occurs when i am trying to provision the servers.
I have configured a remote state and hence terraform tries to destroy the infrastructure created in the past. So even before it reaches the creation of the current infrastructure the error occurs. This is the gist of the output https://gist.github.com/d93bef6830d0cf6a5ad6b279750c4b56
One thing I noticed is if i do not configure a remote-state, the servers get provisioned a work nicely.
So after getting this
i/o timeout
error i try to deprovision ( just so that maybe terraform gets to a clean state) and in that caseconnection timed out
error occurs.This is the gist of the output https://gist.github.com/girishramnani/0e80c9ef7582e13f07cebc1438f5fdd2. I am running terraform on an aws instance so this issue is not related to the internet speed.
Terraform Version - 0.7.4
Expected behavior
The servers should be provisioned
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: