Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

changing route53_zone.name_servers back to list #1633

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 29, 2015

Conversation

lamdor
Copy link
Contributor

@lamdor lamdor commented Apr 22, 2015

Related to #1525 and #1573, I had to change the computed name_servers attribute back to a list so the values could be referenced elsewhere as they are in the docs. Until we can reference set elements correctly, this was about the only way I could think of to get it to work. I've verified that the name servers are returned from the AWS API are in a consistent ordering as well.

PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws    140.474s

@mitchellh
Copy link
Contributor

This is fine, as long as we can sort them. Can you sort the nameservers? This will prevent the AWS API returning different orders and messing things up.

@lamdor
Copy link
Contributor Author

lamdor commented Apr 23, 2015

@mitchellh I've changed them to be sorted.

--- PASS: TestAccRoute53Zone (135.85s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform/builtin/providers/aws    135.859s

@lamdor
Copy link
Contributor Author

lamdor commented Apr 29, 2015

@mitchellh @phinze Any chance this can get merged?

@phinze
Copy link
Contributor

phinze commented Apr 29, 2015

LGTM

phinze added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2015
changing route53_zone.name_servers back to list
@phinze phinze merged commit 950bd92 into hashicorp:master Apr 29, 2015
@lamdor
Copy link
Contributor Author

lamdor commented Apr 29, 2015

Thanks.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 3, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 3, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants