Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

helper/schema: validate ConflictsWith against top-level #1926

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 12, 2015

Conversation

phinze
Copy link
Contributor

@phinze phinze commented May 12, 2015

The runtime impl of ConfictsWith uses Resource.Get(), which makes it
work with any other attribute of the resource - the InternalValidate was
only checking against the local schemaMap though, preventing subResource
from using ConflictsWith properly.

It's a lot of wiring and it's a bit ugly, but it's not runtime code, so
I'm a bit less concerned about that aspect.

This should take care of the problem mentioned in #1909

The runtime impl of ConfictsWith uses Resource.Get(), which makes it
work with any other attribute of the resource - the InternalValidate was
only checking against the local schemaMap though, preventing subResource
from using ConflictsWith properly.

It's a lot of wiring and it's a bit ugly, but it's not runtime code, so
I'm a bit less concerned about that aspect.

This should take care of the problem mentioned in #1909
@radeksimko
Copy link
Member

... and I was afraid to do a such refactoring when creating this 😄
but better make it work first, then make it nice, I guess...

justincampbell added a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2015
…st-top-schema-map

helper/schema: validate ConflictsWith against top-level
@justincampbell justincampbell merged commit 969b779 into master May 12, 2015
@justincampbell justincampbell deleted the b-validate-confictswith-against-top-schema-map branch May 12, 2015 15:23
catsby pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2016
… Launch Configurations [GH-6512]

Fixed the problem where the root_block_device could cause an apply error
by reading back an "encrypted" parameter that was meant for an
ebs_block_device.  "encrypted" is not part of the root_block_device
schema, since it can't be set explicitly.

Added a check in Create to fail when the root device is incorrectly
specified as an ebs_block_device, as this causes continual refreshing
due to mismatched state between root_block_device and ebs_block_device.

"encrypted" and "snapshot_id" should be guarded with ConflictsWith, but
that doesn't appear to work on nested resources despite #1926.
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented May 2, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 2, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants