Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typo: associate_public_ip_address parameter name in resource_aws_instance.go #262

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 3, 2014

Conversation

shin1x1
Copy link
Contributor

@shin1x1 shin1x1 commented Sep 3, 2014

I found a typo parameter name in builtin/providers/aws/resource_aws_db_instance.go.
This bug seems to me that is the cause of below problems.

#214
#252

@pearkes pearkes changed the title Typo: associate_public_ip_address parameter name in resource_aws_db_instance.go Typo: associate_public_ip_address parameter name in resource_aws_instance.go Sep 3, 2014
@pearkes
Copy link
Contributor

pearkes commented Sep 3, 2014

Ah, yes, thank you!

pearkes added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 3, 2014
Typo: associate_public_ip_address parameter name in resource_aws_instance.go
@pearkes pearkes merged commit 946a075 into hashicorp:master Sep 3, 2014
@levinotik
Copy link

So #214 is fixed now in 0.2.1? Can I now have a public ip without also creating an elastic ip resource?

@mitchellh
Copy link
Contributor

@levinotik This will be in 0.2.2

@levinotik
Copy link

@mitchellh thanks. Are there release notes for 0.2.1? I'm using terraform heavily to manage production infrastructure and want to stay abreast of changes/fixes.

@mitchellh
Copy link
Contributor

@levinotik Yes, absolutely, There is a CHANGELOG in the root that will keep you updated.

@levinotik
Copy link

@mitchellh great thanks!

@levinotik
Copy link

@mitchellh what if i wanted the fix sooner? could i just clone master and make dev to get binaries?

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 5, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants