Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PowerDNS provider #4181

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

PowerDNS provider #4181

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

alkersan
Copy link
Contributor

@alkersan alkersan commented Dec 6, 2015

Please review implementation of proposal #4171 for PowerDNS provider.

  • HTTP client for PowerDNS is bundled with provider code, as I didn't find any official nor community implementation. Currently it includes only subset of operations needed by provider.
  • acceptance tests include creation of common record types, supported by PowerDNS.
  • tested on local PowerDNS Authoritative v3.4.7
  • DNSSEC is not covered.
  • site documentation section included.

@jen20
Copy link
Contributor

jen20 commented Jan 28, 2016

Hi @alkersan! Thanks for opening this pull request! I've rebased this onto master, and made a couple of minor tweaks to formatting and the function which checks whether resources were destroyed after tests. In addition I've set up a containerised acceptance testing environment so we can build this into the nightly build. Because of the rebase, I've pushed to a branch in hashicorp/terraform, so I'll merge that and close this PR. Thanks for your work!

@jen20 jen20 closed this Jan 28, 2016
@jen20 jen20 mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2016
@alkersan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you @jen20 ! I already despaired about acceptance of this provider. If you have suggestions for improvement - feel free to share, I have some spare time for coding.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Apr 28, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 28, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants