Officially support "local" remote state #6213
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
joshuaspence
changed the title
|
Hi @joshuaspence! We're going to pick this up and modify it to work with data sources now that 0.7 is out in the wild. Thanks for the pull request! |
jen20
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2016
This is a rework of pull request #6213 submitted by @joshuaspence, adjusted to work with the remote state data source. We also add a deprecation warning for people using the unsupported API, and retain the ability to refer to "_local" as well as "local" for users in a mixed version environment.
jen20
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 3, 2016
This is a rework of pull request #6213 submitted by @joshuaspence, adjusted to work with the remote state data source. We also add a deprecation warning for people using the unsupported API, and retain the ability to refer to "_local" as well as "local" for users in a mixed version environment.
|
Hi @joshuaspence! I've reworked this to include backwards compatibility and to work with the data source - the PR is over at #8647. Thanks for the initial work here - I've reused your original documentation! |
apparentlymart
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2017
This is a rework of pull request #6213 submitted by @joshuaspence, adjusted to work with the remote state data source. We also add a deprecation warning for people using the unsupported API, and retain the ability to refer to "_local" as well as "local" for users in a mixed version environment.
|
I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems similar to this, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further. |
ghost
locked and limited conversation to collaborators
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See #3618. I'm not entirely sure if any other changes are required here, but would appreciate some feedback. Quite possibly maybe this PR should wait until after #4169.