Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for true/false string literals for agent injector #22996
Add support for true/false string literals for agent injector #22996
Changes from 3 commits
745c7c1
1f73496
2cffcb1
6153b56
3b4cfe7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! Would you be able to throw in some go doc comments for the test methods please?
Side note, what do you think about a table driven test for the
authenticate_from_environment
testing?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call! Added the godocs.
I personally find that table driven tests feel a little overkill for tests like this -- we're not saving a lot of complexity/repetition really, and as-is, tests are nice and simple and self-contained, with a lot less to think about when reading the test. I think it's a preference thing, but that's why I did it this way.
I did add the t.Parallels though! Almost forgot those :)