Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sidebranch: remove delta, toggle, and make auto-refresh #8945
Sidebranch: remove delta, toggle, and make auto-refresh #8945
Changes from all commits
311d91b
1ece2ff
ec91410
d4d5bc4
9c4fb63
64bc8a0
3915ab0
429f781
1bbea9b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm not entirely positive this will work if
reindexing_building_progress
orreindex_building_total
doesn't exist, which is often the case. did you test it out? otherwise i'll work on it in my next pr 🔨There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't test it so that would be great if you could 🔨 it on your next pr 😁
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is interesting -- this link doesn't actually work for me because it's taking me to
https://127.0.0.1:8201
(presumably the cluster address itself) instead ofhttp://localhost:4200/ui/
(the UI server). if the intention of this link is to be able to click through to the other UI, how do we use the cluster address to find the UI? we are going to need to solve this problem for the known secondaries table as well. 🤔There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
related: this scenario should be included in the acceptance tests somehow...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call. Let me see if I can dig up any info on this and I'll also try and add an acceptance test for it. I'll address in the next PR as I suspect I'll be delayed a bit on getting feedback.
This file was deleted.
This file was deleted.