Update eslint npm packages

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change	Pending
eslint (source)	devDependencies	minor	9.17.0 -> 9.18.0
eslint (source)	dependencies	minor	9.17.0 -> 9.18.0
eslint-config-sheriff (source)	dependencies	minor	25.5.0 -> 25.6.0	25.7.0
eslint-plugin-canonical	dependencies	patch	5.1.2 -> 5.1.3

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v9.18.0

Compare Source

Features

• e84e6e2 feat: Report allowed methods for no-console rule (#​19306) (Anna Bocharova)
• 8efc2d0 feat: unflag TypeScript config files (#​19266) (Francesco Trotta)
• 87a9352 feat: check imports and class names in no-shadow-restricted-names (#​19272) (Milos Djermanovic)

Bug Fixes

• da768d4 fix: correct overrideConfigFile type (#​19289) (Francesco Trotta)

Documentation

• d9c23c5 docs: replace var with const in rule examples (#​19325) (Tanuj Kanti)
• 8e1a898 docs: add tabs to cli code blocks (#​18784) (Jay)
• f3aeefb docs: rewrite using let and const in rule examples (#​19320) (PoloSpark)
• 0b680b3 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• 98c86a9 docs: Edit this page button link to different branches (#​19228) (Tanuj Kanti)
• 6947901 docs: remove hardcoded edit link (#​19323) (Milos Djermanovic)
• 03f2f44 docs: rewrite var with const in rules examples (#​19317) (Thiago)
• 26c3003 docs: Clarify dangers of eslint:all (#​19318) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
• c038257 docs: add eqeqeq in related rules to no-eq-null (#​19310) (루밀LuMir)
• 89c8fc5 docs: rewrite examples with var using let and const (#​19315) (Amaresh S M)
• db574c4 docs: add missing backticks to no-void (#​19313) (루밀LuMir)
• 8d943c3 docs: add missing backticks to default-case-last (#​19311) (루밀LuMir)
• 36ef8bb docs: rewrite examples with var using let and const (#​19298) (Amaresh S M)
• 1610c9e docs: add missing backticks to no-else-return (#​19309) (루밀LuMir)
• df409d8 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• 2e84213 docs: Fix Horizontal Scroll Overflow in Rule Description on Mobile View (#​19304) (Amaresh S M)
• 6e7361b docs: replace var with let and const in rule example (#​19302) (Tanuj Kanti)
• 069af5e docs: rewrite var using const in rule examples (#​19303) (Kim GyeonWon)
• 064e35d docs: remove 'I hope to' comments from scope-manager-interface (#​19300) (Josh Goldberg ✨)
• 8e00305 docs: replace var with const in rule examples (#​19299) (Tanuj Kanti)
• a559009 docs: Add warning about extending core rules (#​19295) (Nicholas C. Zakas)
• 0bfdf6c docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• ce0b9ff docs: add navigation link for code explorer (#​19285) (Tanuj Kanti)
• e255cc9 docs: add bluesky icon to footer (#​19290) (Tanuj Kanti)
• 5d64851 docs: remove outdated info about environments (#​19296) (Francesco Trotta)
• eec01f0 docs: switch rule examples config format to languageOptions (#​19277) (Milos Djermanovic)
• b36ca0a docs: Fixing Focus Order by Rearranging Element Sequence (#​19241) (Amaresh S M)
• d122c8a docs: add missing backticks to sort-imports (#​19282) (루밀LuMir)
• 0367a70 docs: update custom parser docs (#​19288) (Francesco Trotta)
• 8c07ebb docs: add border-radius to hX:target selector styles (#​19270) (루밀LuMir)
• eff7c57 docs: add limitation section in no-loop-func (#​19287) (Tanuj Kanti)
• 5db226f docs: add missing backticks in various parts of the documentation (#​19269) (루밀LuMir)
• 789edbb docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• 613c06a docs: mark rules that are frozen with ❄️ (#​19231) (Amaresh S M)
• 43172ec docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• ac8b3c4 docs: fix description of overrideConfigFile option (#​19262) (Milos Djermanovic)
• bbb9b46 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
• 995b492 docs: fix inconsistent divider in rule categories box (#​19249) (Tanuj Kanti)
• f76d05d docs: Refactor search result handling with better event listener cleanup (#​19252) (Amaresh S M)
• c5f3d7d docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)

Chores

• c52be85 chore: upgrade to @eslint/js@9.18.0 (#​19330) (Francesco Trotta)
• 362099c chore: package.json update for @​eslint/js release (Jenkins)
• 495aa49 chore: extract package name from package.json for public interface (#​19314) (루밀LuMir)
• 6fe0e72 chore: update dependency @​eslint/json to ^0.9.0 (#​19263) (renovate[bot])

AndreaPontrandolfo/sheriff (eslint-config-sheriff)

v25.6.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes

• 823696e: feat(config): replace eslint-define-config with tseslint.config().
  Fixes #​343

gajus/eslint-plugin-canonical (eslint-plugin-canonical)

v5.1.3

Compare Source

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vilkinsons]

@CiaranMn will also take a look at this.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.31%. Comparing base (d84b731) to head (600c4ac).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6095   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   21.31%   21.31%           
=======================================
  Files         570      570           
  Lines       19541    19541           
  Branches     2857     2857           
=======================================
  Hits         4166     4166           
  Misses      15323    15323           
  Partials       52       52           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.39% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.15% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.17% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.94% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-18.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.99 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.72 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.438 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.632 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.09 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.165 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-29.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 183 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-28.860 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 160 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 138 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-8.543 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.902 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 165 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.262 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 167 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 188 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.364 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 159 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.13 \mathrm{ms} \pm 5.04 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.172 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$87.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 389 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.607 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$82.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 323 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.781 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$73.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.210 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$90.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.496 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 486 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 258 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$53.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$48.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 262 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.886 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$42.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 124 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.433 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$66.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$38.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.801 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$176 \mathrm{ms} \pm 697 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.093 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$20.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.980 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 200 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}27.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$5.59 \mathrm{s} \pm 283 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{red}2003 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 7.96 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.648 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 61.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.11 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$1.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.283 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.34 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.583 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph