Update opentelemetry Rust crates

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
opentelemetry	workspace.dependencies	minor	=0.27.1 -> =0.28.0
opentelemetry-otlp (source)	workspace.dependencies	minor	=0.27.0 -> =0.28.0
opentelemetry_sdk	workspace.dependencies	minor	=0.27.1 -> =0.28.0
tracing-opentelemetry	workspace.dependencies	minor	=0.28.0 -> =0.29.0

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rust (opentelemetry)

v0.28.0: 0.28.0 Release

Compare Source

See changelog for individual crates to know the exact set of changes. All crates in this repo follows same version (0.28.0 for this release).

This release also upgrades

• Logs API to stable
• Logs-SDK, Logs OTLP exporter, Logs-Appender-Tracing to RC
• Metrics-API to stable
• Metrics-SDK, Metrics OTLP exporter to RC.

This release introduces several breaking changes as we progress toward a stable version for logs and metrics. We recommend reviewing the Migration Guide along with the changelogs to ensure a smooth upgrade.

open-telemetry/opentelemetry-rust (opentelemetry-otlp)

v0.28.0

Compare Source

Released 2025-Feb-10

• Update opentelemetry dependency version to 0.28.
• Update opentelemetry_sdk dependency version to 0.28.
• Update opentelemetry-http dependency version to 0.28.
• Update opentelemetry-proto dependency version to 0.28.
• Bump msrv to 1.75.0.
• Feature flag "populate-logs-event-name" is removed as no longer relevant.
  LogRecord's event_name() is now automatically populated on the newly added
  "event_name" field in LogRecord proto definition.
• Remove "grpc-tonic" feature from default, and instead add "http-proto" and
  "reqwest-blocking-client" features as default, to align with the
  specification.
  2516
• Remove unnecessarily public trait opentelemetry_otlp::metrics::MetricsClient
  and MetricExporter::new(..) method. Use
  MetricExporter::builder()...build() to obtain MetricExporter.
• The HTTP clients (reqwest, reqwest-blocking, hyper) now support the
  export timeout interval configured in below order
  • Signal specific env variable OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_TRACES_TIMEOUT,
    OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_LOGS_TIMEOUT or OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_TIMEOUT.
  • OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_TIMEOUT env variable.
  • with_http().with_timeout() API method of
    LogExporterBuilder and SpanExporterBuilder and MetricsExporterBuilder.
  • The default interval of 10 seconds is used if none is configured.

tokio-rs/tracing-opentelemetry (tracing-opentelemetry)

v0.29.0

Compare Source

What's Changed

• Fix the example installing OpenTelemetryLayer into a global subscriber by @​mzabaluev in https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing-opentelemetry/pull/175
• Update dependencies by @​djc in https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing-opentelemetry/pull/187
• Use renamed WASI target by @​djc in https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing-opentelemetry/pull/189
• use the tracing event name as the otel event name by @​zzlk in https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing-opentelemetry/pull/188
• Update opentelemetry to 0.28 by @​cschramm in https://github.com/tokio-rs/tracing-opentelemetry/pull/193

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 21.00%. Comparing base (035b26c) to head (37181a7).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #6409   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   21.00%   21.00%           
=======================================
  Files         583      583           
  Lines       20048    20048           
  Branches     2992     2992           
=======================================
  Hits         4212     4212           
  Misses      15779    15779           
  Partials       57       57           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.30% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	1.14% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	46.42% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	50.93% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-backend-utils	8.81% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	58.62% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.89% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-subgraph	24.54% <ø> (ø)
rust.deer	6.66% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	72.53% <ø> (ø)
rust.sarif	88.81% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

scaling_read_entity_complete_zero_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.236 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$2.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$4.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.589 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 233 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.613 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-31.398 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 177 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-33.874 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-7.770 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-11.484 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 205 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.011 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 166 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.343 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 220 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.877 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$66.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 251 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.429 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 150 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$53.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.027 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$56.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.059 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$48.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 299 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.959 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$43.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 311 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.851 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=255, PT=255, ET=255, E=255	$$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 284 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.992 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=0	$$39.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 196 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.862 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$87.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 524 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.612 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=2, PT=2, ET=2, E=2	$$92.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 542 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.149 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=2, E=2	$$84.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 696 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
link_by_source_by_property	depths: DT=0, PT=0, ET=0, E=2	$$75.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_complete_one_depth

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$57.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 206 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}79.8 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	25 entities	$$179 \mathrm{ms} \pm 422 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.242 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	5 entities	$$27.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 155 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.681 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	50 entities	$$270 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.45 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{lightgreen}-95.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$21.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.078 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: d4e16033-c281-4cde-aa35-9085bf2e7579	$$2.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.95 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.039 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

scaling_read_entity_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$2.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.02 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.35 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$2.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.48 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.019 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 68.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$2.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 6.19 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.677 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph