Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduce minor fixes before 5.2.0 #620

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2023

Conversation

mdumandag
Copy link
Contributor

  • Updated the Hazelcast version used in README and examples to 5.2
  • Renamed CompactSerializableClass to CompactSerializableType to be more consistent with the other type-var definitions.

- Updated the Hazelcast version used in README and examples to 5.2
- Renamed CompactSerializableClass to CompactSerializableType to
be more consistent with the other type-var definitions.
@mdumandag mdumandag added this to the 5.2.0 milestone Mar 27, 2023
@mdumandag mdumandag requested a review from yuce March 27, 2023 11:09
@mdumandag mdumandag self-assigned this Mar 27, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #620 (6b2d070) into master (dbe73f5) will decrease coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #620      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.52%   96.51%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         357      357              
  Lines       20632    20632              
==========================================
- Hits        19915    19912       -3     
- Misses        717      720       +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
hazelcast/serialization/api.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@mdumandag mdumandag merged commit d6090fc into hazelcast:master Mar 28, 2023
@mdumandag mdumandag deleted the minor-5.2-fixes branch March 28, 2023 08:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants