Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IZE-676 added use-yarn option for sls #516

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2022

Conversation

psihachina
Copy link
Contributor

Change:

added use-yarn option for sls

Test:

asciicast

@psihachina psihachina changed the title IZE-676 c IZE-676 added use-yarn option for sls Oct 25, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@AutomationD AutomationD left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, thank you

@psihachina psihachina force-pushed the IZE-676-sls-ability-to-use-yarn-instead-of-npm-npx branch from dc6ccf3 to a1bbc97 Compare October 25, 2022 16:37
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #516 (a1bbc97) into main (184ae31) will increase coverage by 0.12%.
The diff coverage is 40.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #516      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   30.66%   30.79%   +0.12%     
==========================================
  Files          62       62              
  Lines        8039     8077      +38     
==========================================
+ Hits         2465     2487      +22     
- Misses       5340     5351      +11     
- Partials      234      239       +5     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/commands/down.go 9.38% <11.11%> (+0.44%) ⬆️
internal/commands/up.go 15.58% <11.11%> (+0.55%) ⬆️
internal/manager/serverless/native.go 59.14% <50.00%> (-1.66%) ⬇️
internal/manager/serverless/serverless.go 57.43% <66.66%> (+0.58%) ⬆️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@psihachina psihachina merged commit f4b4ba6 into main Oct 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants