-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
icons: added and other enhancements #29
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@pateash has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 42 minutes and 42 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent changes encompass updates to documentation generation commands, configuration file adjustments, dependency modifications, and enhanced labeling for GitHub actions. The primary focus is on transitioning to using Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
docs/source/conf.py (1)
Line range hint
24-24
: Security issue: Exposed API key.The API key is hardcoded, which could lead to security vulnerabilities. Consider using environment variables to securely manage sensitive keys.
- docsearch_api_key = "21a390a684536b73f0aee9a20c708c4b" + docsearch_api_key = os.getenv("DOCSEARCH_API_KEY")Please ensure the environment variable
DOCSEARCH_API_KEY
is set in your deployment environment.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- docs/source/conf.py (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Gitleaks
docs/source/conf.py
24-24: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (1)
docs/source/conf.py (1)
53-53
: Formatting improvement approved.The added space after the colon improves readability and consistency in the codebase.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #29 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 87.61% 87.61%
=======================================
Files 13 13
Lines 557 557
Branches 140 140
=======================================
Hits 488 488
Misses 51 51
Partials 18 18 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
docs/source/_static/favicon.ico
is excluded by!**/*.ico
Files selected for processing (3)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- docs/source/conf.py (2 hunks)
- pyproject.toml (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Gitleaks
docs/source/conf.py
24-24: Detected a Generic API Key, potentially exposing access to various services and sensitive operations. (generic-api-key)
Additional comments not posted (7)
Makefile (1)
71-71
: Update in documentation command approved.The change from
hatch run dev:docs
tohatch run docs:docs
aligns with the restructuring in the documentation process. Ensure that this new command is correctly configured in the Hatch tool.docs/source/conf.py (4)
36-37
: Addition of favicon approved.The setting
html_favicon = '_static/favicon.ico'
correctly specifies the path to the favicon, which enhances the branding in the documentation.
45-51
: Enhancement with navigation links approved.The addition of PyPI navigation links under "nav_links" is a good enhancement for user navigation and accessibility.
55-59
: Formatting change approved.The addition of space after the colon in the "announcement" string improves readability and consistency in formatting.
20-20
: Potential security risk: exposed API key.The API key included in the configuration file should not be hardcoded. Consider using environment variables to manage sensitive data securely.
- docsearch_api_key = "21a390a684536b73f0aee9a20c708c4b" + docsearch_api_key = os.getenv("DOCSEARCH_API_KEY")Likely invalid or redundant comment.
pyproject.toml (2)
39-39
: Addition of dependency approved.Including
fastavro
as a dependency supports handling the Avro file format, which could benefit projects requiring such functionality.
105-115
: Enhancements in documentation scripts and dependencies approved.The adjustments made in the scripts section under
[tool.hatch.envs.docs]
and the re-addition of Sphinx-related packages are beneficial for maintaining comprehensive and up-to-date documentation.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/labeler.yml (2 hunks)
- .readthedocs.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/labeler.yml
Additional comments not posted (2)
.readthedocs.yaml (2)
23-23
: Sphinx configuration path is correctly setThe
sphinx
configuration path is set appropriately, pointing to the correct configuration file. This is a good practice to maintain clarity and organization in documentation configuration.
13-21
: Review manual command setup for documentation environmentThe changes introduce manual command setup using
hatch
instead ofpip
. This aligns with the summary mentioning a switch from usingpip
to usinghatch
for environment setup. However, ensure that thehatch shell docs
command correctly activates the 'docs' environment before proceeding with the installations.Verification successful
Verified presence of 'hatch shell docs' in .readthedocs.yaml
The
hatch shell docs
command is correctly present in the.readthedocs.yaml
file as intended. This confirms that the manual setup usinghatch
is correctly configured.
.readthedocs.yaml
, line with- hatch shell docs
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct activation of the 'docs' environment using hatch. # Test: Check if `hatch shell docs` correctly activates the environment. ast-grep --lang yaml --pattern $'commands { $$$ "hatch shell docs" { $$$ } $$$ }'Length of output: 205
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the presence of the 'hatch shell docs' command in the .readthedocs.yaml file. # Search for the 'hatch shell docs' command in the .readthedocs.yaml file. rg 'hatch shell docs' .readthedocs.yamlLength of output: 64
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .readthedocs.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .gitignore
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .readthedocs.yaml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .readthedocs.yaml (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .readthedocs.yaml
closes #30
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
hatch
for building documentation.Build System
_build/
to.gitignore
to exclude build artifacts from version control.