Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
contrib: rename cc to cxx in binary checking scripts
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
theuni authored and hebasto committed Jul 11, 2024
1 parent 19307f5 commit 2ea2f53
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 2 changed files with 51 additions and 51 deletions.
76 changes: 38 additions & 38 deletions contrib/devtools/test-security-check.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ def env_flags() -> list[str]:
flags += filter(None, os.environ.get(var, '').split(' '))
return flags

def call_security_check(cc: str, source: str, executable: str, options) -> tuple:
subprocess.run([*cc,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags() + options, check=True)
def call_security_check(cxx: str, source: str, executable: str, options) -> tuple:
subprocess.run([*cxx,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags() + options, check=True)
p = subprocess.run([os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'security-check.py'), executable], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, text=True)
return (p.returncode, p.stdout.rstrip())

def get_arch(cc, source, executable):
subprocess.run([*cc, source, '-o', executable] + env_flags(), check=True)
def get_arch(cxx, source, executable):
subprocess.run([*cxx, source, '-o', executable] + env_flags(), check=True)
binary = lief.parse(executable)
arch = binary.abstract.header.architecture
os.remove(executable)
Expand All @@ -54,91 +54,91 @@ class TestSecurityChecks(unittest.TestCase):
def test_ELF(self):
source = 'test1.cpp'
executable = 'test1'
cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'g++')
cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'g++')
write_testcode(source)
arch = get_arch(cc, source, executable)
arch = get_arch(cxx, source, executable)

if arch == lief.ARCHITECTURES.X86:
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed PIE NX RELRO CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed RELRO CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed separate_code CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code', '-fcf-protection=full']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code', '-fcf-protection=full']),
(0, ''))
else:
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-zexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed PIE NX RELRO'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-no-pie','-fno-PIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed PIE RELRO'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-znorelro','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed RELRO'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,noseparate-code']),
(1, executable+': failed separate_code'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-znoexecstack','-Wl,-zrelro','-Wl,-z,now','-pie','-fPIE', '-Wl,-z,separate-code']),
(0, ''))

clean_files(source, executable)

def test_PE(self):
source = 'test1.cpp'
executable = 'test1.exe'
cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++')
cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++')
write_testcode(source)

self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--disable-nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fno-stack-protector']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--disable-nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fno-stack-protector']),
(1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA NX RELOC_SECTION CONTROL_FLOW Canary'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--disable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
(1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA RELOC_SECTION CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-no-pie','-fno-PIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
(1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--disable-dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
(1, executable+': failed PIE DYNAMIC_BASE HIGH_ENTROPY_VA CONTROL_FLOW')) # -pie -fPIE does nothing unless --dynamicbase is also supplied
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--disable-high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
(1, executable+': failed HIGH_ENTROPY_VA CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
(1, executable+': failed CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE', '-fcf-protection=full','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--nxcompat','-Wl,--enable-reloc-section','-Wl,--dynamicbase','-Wl,--high-entropy-va','-pie','-fPIE', '-fcf-protection=full','-fstack-protector-all', '-lssp']),
(0, ''))

clean_files(source, executable)

def test_MACHO(self):
source = 'test1.cpp'
executable = 'test1'
cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'clang++')
cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'clang++')
write_testcode(source)
arch = get_arch(cc, source, executable)
arch = get_arch(cxx, source, executable)

if arch == lief.ARCHITECTURES.X86:
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-no_pie','-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-no_pie','-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']),
(1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary FIXUP_CHAINS PIE CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
(1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
(1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
(1, executable+': failed CONTROL_FLOW'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-fcf-protection=full', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-fcf-protection=full', '-Wl,-fixup_chains']),
(0, ''))
else:
# arm64 darwin doesn't support non-PIE binaries, control flow or executable stacks
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-no_fixup_chains']),
(1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary FIXUP_CHAINS BRANCH_PROTECTION'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fno-stack-protector', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
(1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS Canary'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-flat_namespace','-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
(1, executable+': failed NOUNDEFS'))
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cc, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
self.assertEqual(call_security_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-fstack-protector-all', '-Wl,-fixup_chains', '-mbranch-protection=bti']),
(0, ''))


Expand Down
26 changes: 13 additions & 13 deletions contrib/devtools/test-symbol-check.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@

from utils import determine_wellknown_cmd

def call_symbol_check(cc: list[str], source, executable, options):
def call_symbol_check(cxx: list[str], source, executable, options):
# This should behave the same as AC_TRY_LINK, so arrange well-known flags
# in the same order as autoconf would.
#
Expand All @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ def call_symbol_check(cc: list[str], source, executable, options):
for var in ['CXXFLAGS', 'CPPFLAGS', 'LDFLAGS']:
env_flags += filter(None, os.environ.get(var, '').split(' '))

subprocess.run([*cc,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags + options, check=True)
subprocess.run([*cxx,source,'-o',executable] + env_flags + options, check=True)
p = subprocess.run([os.path.join(os.path.dirname(__file__), 'symbol-check.py'), executable], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, text=True)
os.remove(source)
os.remove(executable)
Expand All @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ class TestSymbolChecks(unittest.TestCase):
def test_ELF(self):
source = 'test1.cpp'
executable = 'test1'
cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'g++')
cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'g++')

# -lutil is part of the libc6 package so a safe bet that it's installed
# it's also out of context enough that it's unlikely to ever become a real dependency
Expand All @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ def test_ELF(self):
}
''')

self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lutil']),
self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lutil']),
(1, executable + ': libutil.so.1 is not in ALLOWED_LIBRARIES!\n' +
executable + ': failed LIBRARY_DEPENDENCIES'))

Expand All @@ -66,13 +66,13 @@ def test_ELF(self):
}
''')

self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, []),
self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, []),
(0, ''))

def test_MACHO(self):
source = 'test1.cpp'
executable = 'test1'
cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'clang++')
cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'clang++')

with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f:
f.write('''
Expand All @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ def test_MACHO(self):
''')

self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lexpat', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']),
self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lexpat', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']),
(1, 'libexpat.1.dylib is not in ALLOWED_LIBRARIES!\n' +
f'{executable}: failed DYNAMIC_LIBRARIES MIN_OS SDK'))

Expand All @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ def test_MACHO(self):
}
''')

self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-framework', 'CoreGraphics', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']),
self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-framework', 'CoreGraphics', '-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.4', '-Wl,11.4']),
(1, f'{executable}: failed MIN_OS SDK'))

source = 'test3.cpp'
Expand All @@ -116,13 +116,13 @@ def test_MACHO(self):
}
''')

self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.0', '-Wl,11.4']),
self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,-platform_version','-Wl,macos', '-Wl,11.0', '-Wl,11.4']),
(1, f'{executable}: failed SDK'))

def test_PE(self):
source = 'test1.cpp'
executable = 'test1.exe'
cc = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++')
cxx = determine_wellknown_cmd('CXX', 'x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++')

with open(source, 'w', encoding="utf8") as f:
f.write('''
Expand All @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ def test_PE(self):
}
''')

self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lpdh', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']),
self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lpdh', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']),
(1, 'pdh.dll is not in ALLOWED_LIBRARIES!\n' +
executable + ': failed DYNAMIC_LIBRARIES'))

Expand All @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ def test_PE(self):
}
''')

self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9']),
self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,9']),
(1, executable + ': failed SUBSYSTEM_VERSION'))

source = 'test3.cpp'
Expand All @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ def test_PE(self):
}
''')

self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cc, source, executable, ['-lole32', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']),
self.assertEqual(call_symbol_check(cxx, source, executable, ['-lole32', '-Wl,--major-subsystem-version', '-Wl,6', '-Wl,--minor-subsystem-version', '-Wl,1']),
(0, ''))


Expand Down

0 comments on commit 2ea2f53

Please sign in to comment.