Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Use ModuleHandlerInterface instead of ModuleHandler #4333

Closed
esolitos opened this issue Sep 7, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4334
Closed

fix: Use ModuleHandlerInterface instead of ModuleHandler #4333

esolitos opened this issue Sep 7, 2022 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4334

Comments

@esolitos
Copy link

esolitos commented Sep 7, 2022

Currently the implementation of Update/ExecuteComamnd relies on ModuleHandler, however some modules might want to decorate/replace this service so the class name won't match.

ModuleHandler $moduleHandler,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant